AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ringo starr ms paint art12/18/2022 ![]() ![]() If you are interested in any of the works, you can contact the gallery. All the works are signed by Ringo and framed with UV glass to protect the image and his signature. ![]() The gallery currently has some of his works available for purchase. It’s a natural move of things like pop music and even Popeye the sailor man.” –Ringo, 2005. “In its way “Pop” art is always changing-like “Pop” artists. To give him credit, he does donate all the proceeds of his art to charity. While I was touring it gave me something to do in all those crazy hotels you have to stay in on the road. Ringo Starr’s art is based in MS Paint, and is all broad, shaky mouse-driven lines and giant paint bucket fills of color. SOLD OUT Chef Alamode SOLD OUT SKU: RS2005-1002 Categories: Prints, Ringo. “I started in the late nineties with my computer art. Ringo Starr Art Art Celebs The Lotus Foundation Cart. While he had no intention of selling his works, he decided to create limited editions and donate the money from his sales to the Lotus Foundation in the United Kingdom. ![]() His computer art became his preferred medium because of its immediate effect. ![]() He has experimented with colored pencils, acrylic paints and oils and began designing on the computer while in hotel rooms. But if you think all modern art on that page would be found uninteresting by anyone without an art education I’d encourage you to do your experiment and I think you’d be surprised.Ringo started painting with acrylics at a young age, but it was not until the 1990’s when he was introduced to oil paints that he felt comfortable as an artist. If you’re just saying in the end modern and classical art don’t exist as defined concepts except by showing individual pieces to people without art educations who are then qualified to sort them into modern or classical categories based on whether they find them interesting or wtf then fine, I don’t really agree but now I see what you’re saying. I would be surprised if you could really show a Van Gogh to someone without an art education, and without explaining the context, and they wouldn’t say it was interesting. Arin asks Danny if he’s ever seen Ringo’s MSPaint Art, to which Danny replies that he hasn’t. The Animation Danny and Arin walk through a museum. It uses audio from the Super Mario Sunshine episode 'You're a Starr'. This still seems to me like you have redefined modern and classical as interesting and not interesting art you like. 'Ringo Starr's MSPaint Art' is an official episode of Game Grumps Animated by LemonyFresh. So, show a piece to someone without an art education, and if they think it is interesting it’s classical art, and if they think it is wtf then it’s modern art, nothing to do with when it was made or the definitions of those terms today? I'm sorry, because I'm sure you didn't realize this, but your taxonomy breaks down to "pieces I like, for which the metadata is old," and "pieces I dislike, for which the metadata is recent."Įdit - or, at best, "pieces I like, with a continuous aesthetic tradition, which made quality easy to evaluate, for which the metadata is old," vs "pieces I dislike, created after that continuity disintegrated, which made quality very subjective, for which the metadata is recent." because there was a massive break in that continuity, and there is a real distinction between modern and "classical" art (at least in the European/Western tradition), but it just doesn't have anything to do with the metadata. and indeed even today two pieces of equivalent beauty and craftsmanship will not sell for the same price if one is a Michaelangelo and the other comes from a less famous artist. I'm sitting here trying to imagine Ringo Starr on a computer in MS Paint (or whatever he used) drawing blobby spacemen, and that alone makes me want to have one hanging on my wall. Except anyone with the slightest background in art history can tell you that those metadata mattered immensely for "classical art" pieces at the time that those pieces were made. I think part of this art is the story behind it. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |